SEARCH
0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Prev | Current Page 870 | Next

Abdul Kasim, Prasanna Adhikari, Nan Chen, and Norman Finn

"Delivering Carrier Ethernet: Extending Ethernet Beyond the LAN"


On the S-component side, frames received on a virtual link are tagged with the S-VID
indicated, and each frame is emitted untagged. The net effect of these VID transformations
is that
?–  Customer 1s C-VLANs 1, 2, and 40 are encapsulated (double-tagged) in S-VLAN 10.
?–  Customer 1s C-VLAN 18 is translated (single-tagged) into S-VLAN 11.
?–  A frame tagged with any other C-VID received from customer 1 is discarded.
?–  Customer 2s odd-numbered C-VLANs are encapsulated in S-VLAN 20.
?–  Customer 2s even-numbered C-VLANs are encapsulated in S-VLAN 21.
It appears that placing a full VLAN bridge on every physical port of a provider
edge bridge can be a very complex and expensive task. Fortunately, two key limitations
on the way C-components can be used reduce its complexity to a simple VID
translation table:
?–  A C-component can have only one physical link on the customer side, no matter
how many virtual links it has.
?–  No C-VID can be enabled on more than one of the virtual ports to the S-component.
Therefore, a C-component never has to bridge from one virtual link to another and
never has to replicate multicast frames; every frame passes directly across the
C-component between a single virtual link and the single physical link.


Pages:
858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882