SEARCH
0-9 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Prev | Current Page 791 | Next

Abdul Kasim, Prasanna Adhikari, Nan Chen, and Norman Finn

"Delivering Carrier Ethernet: Extending Ethernet Beyond the LAN"

The fields are not used.
?–  The Protocol Field is not used.
Figure 12.21 MAC relationship with the physical sublayers
Application
Presentation
Session
Transport
Network
Data-link
Physical
OSI reference
model layers
MAC data path
PRS-1 or PRS-10 GRS SRS
PHY service
interface
SPI-X
HDLC-like
adaptation
GFP adaptation
SONET/SDH PHY
Packet PHY
GMII
XGMII
XAUI
MDI
Medium Medium
Resilient Packet Ring (RPR) 355
?–  The FCS is neither computed nor appended to the frame.
?–  The asynchronous control character map (ACCM) is not used.
LAPS framing for RPR complies with ITU-T X.85 /Y.1321.
Drivers for This Solution
The Ethernet we use today is significantly different than the Ethernet that was originally
created in the IEEE 802.3 group. It is now full duplex and has lost CSMA/CD
as an access method. It has new physical interfaces, different data rates, new port aggregation
features, VLAN functions and many other modifications that have been introduced
over the years to facilitate new applications and uses. In many ways the RPR
MAC is another case of an IEEE standard that facilitates the evolution of Ethernet, in
this case, to the WAN environment.


Pages:
779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803