[16] _Ekamadvitiyam._
[17] This illustration is in the mouth of every Hindu disputant
at the present day.
[18] Barth, p. 75.
[19] _Ekamadvitiyam._
[20]
Volui tibi suaviloquenti
Carmine Pierio rationem exponere nostram
Et quasi Musaeo dulci contingere melle.
[21] Dr. J. Muir, in _North British Review_, No. xlix, p. 224.
[22] _Miscellaneous Writings_ (Macmillan, 1861), vol. i, p.
77.
[23] But the truth is that every man is accounted a good Hindu
who keeps the rules of caste and pays due respect to the Brahmans. What
he believes, or disbelieves, is of little or no consequence.
[24] Yaska, probably in the fifth century B.C.
[25] Weber thinks that Christian elements may have been
introduced, in course of time, into the representation.
[26] His Ramayana was written in Hindi verse in the sixteenth
century.
[27] When Jhansi was captured in the times of the great mutiny
English officers were disgusted to see the walls of the queen's palace
covered with what they described as "grossly obscene" pictures. There is
little or no doubt that these were simply representations of the acts of
Krishna. Therefore to the Hindu queen they were religious pictures.
Pages:
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150